I published the issue in the Intel Community forum. I hope they can help.
In the meantime, I'll try to work with a usb to ethernet adapter (which of
course supports PTP) - does anyone have recommendations?
(I think I should publish this question on a different topic...)

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:34 PM Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 6/18/2021 2:10 AM, Joseph Matan wrote:
> > The original state of the NIC (after reset) is:
> >
> > ethtool --show-eee eth0
> > EEE Settings for eth0:
> >         EEE status: enabled - inactive
> >         Tx LPI: 17 (us)
> >         Supported EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                    1000baseT/Full
> >         Advertised EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                     1000baseT/Full
> >         Link partner advertised EEE link modes:  Not reported
> >
> > ethtool -a eth0
> > Pause parameters for eth0:
> > Autonegotiate:  on
> > RX:             on
> > TX:             on
> >
> > So the first thing I thought was that it's obviously something with eee
> > getting into action.
> > (if it was the flow-control in action, I would expect the delay to get
> > bigger...)
> >
> > But just to be sure, I ran:
> >
> > ethtool -A eth0 autoneg off rx off tx off
> > ethtool -a eth0
> > Pause parameters for eth0:
> > Autonegotiate:  off
> > RX:             off
> > TX:             off
> >
> > ethtool --set-eee eth0 eee off
> > EEE Settings for eth0:
> >         EEE status: disabled
> >         Tx LPI: 17 (us)
> >         Supported EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                    1000baseT/Full
> >         Advertised EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
> >                                     1000baseT/Full
> >         Link partner advertised EEE link modes:  Not reported
> >
> > But there was no effect...
> > Since I still think it's eee in action, my only guess is that turning
> > eee off via ethtool doesn't really work...
>
>
> The only thing I can think of here that would cause this behavior is
> EEE, but it is possible I am missing something else.
>
> > I'll try to see if I can dump the value from the relevant register (and
> > not use ethtool).
> > I just wonder how this issue was ever mentioned before in this forum...
> > From what I see this NIC is quite common.
> >
>
> I guess no one else looked at the delay all that closely?
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to