With all apologies, I'll admit my post was extremely trollish, but I did 
accomplish what I set out to do: get some answers to some questions that 
were bothering me. Was it the best way to do it? Certainly not, but I 
won't make any defense of my actions. I feel the way I feel about this 
whole subject, but I'm willing to let my mind be changed.

Let me make one more thing clear: I WANT to love Linux audio. I WANT to 
use Ardour and code my plug-ins in LV2. What I DON'T want is a ton of 
heart-break in getting from here to there.

And I want to apologize specifically to you, Paul, for tying a can to 
Ardour the way I did. I realized my mistake a few moments after I sent 
the email in frustration. Maybe we need to invent USB mood detectors.

Paul Davis wrote:
> Your criticism of Ardour is not entirely without merit. However, it
> ignores a couple of rather important issues. First is the existence of
> the 3.0 branch of Ardour, which it appears that you know nothing about.

I tried looking on your web site and couldn't find anything. Is there 
something I can read somewhere?

>>  (Nobody in the commercial world is still using a 
>> 32-bit mixing engine, not even Pro-Tools.)
> 
> really?
> 
> PT never used a floating bit mixing engine to start with, and it still
> doesn't today. it uses 56 bit fixed point. there are many very
> experienced audio engineers who believe and/or feel very strongly that
> PT's mix bus sounds horrible.

Okay, I forgot that PT is a fixed point engine. PT LE is a 40-bit 
floating-point bus. I don't know why the difference.

Again, apologies for the troll. Trust me, I am great at stirring the 
pot. In the end, though, I just want to code me some plug-ins and make 
some music.

-- Darren


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel

Reply via email to