-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] linuxsampler source upgrade to GPLv3
From: Roberto Gordo Saez <roberto.go...@gmail.com>
To: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 08/24/09 05:09
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:44:12AM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>   
>> Hi!
>>     
>
> Hey! thanks for response so fast.
>
>   
>> As you might know, LinuxSampler is released under GPL2 with commercial 
>> exception. So no matter if GPL2 or GPL3, the commercial exception still 
>> applies to LinuxSampler and derivative works.
>>     
>
> Yeah, it is the main reason for my question as I must admit that I'm
> quite confused about how to mix it in the GPL3, and specifically this
> point in the GPL FAQ:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoMilitary
>     [...] The GNU GPL is designed specifically to prevent the addition of
>     further restrictions. GPLv3 allows a very limited set of them, in
>     section 7, but any other added restriction can be removed by the
>     user.
>
> and trying to read the GPLv3 section 7 does not help, is more confusing
> for me than the FAQ answer, so that is why I'm asking.
>
>   
>> And btw, the GPL "header" is 
>> not in all source files.
>>     
>
> Ah, OK. I guess that they are all under the GPL, just they don't have the
> notice in them.
>
>   
>> What kind of software do you want to write?
>>     
>
> I'm doing something like a synthesizer that works in the frequency
> domain; it does FFT analysis of samples, then do all operations in
> frequency domain before rendering again to time domain. It is just an
> experiment at this moment, for fun and trying some interesting
> techniques, I think it will never be something serious but there are two
> friends that seem to be interested in hacking the sources, so want to be
> sure that I do it the right way and all pieces I take from other free
> software sources (lots of them, source is quite a mess right now) can be
> combined without incompatibilities before passing the source code to
> others.
>
> So far the GPLv3 seems to be the common license that glues all parts.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
> Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
>   
I personally have issues with GPLv3. I think GPL v2 is good enough for 
any application needs.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel

Reply via email to