Andreas Persson wrote: > On 2011-09-30 08:55, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >> You can probably go ahead and commit it. Just try to adjust as much as >> Andreas >> suggested, and somebody of us will adjust the remainder afterwards. >> >> CU >> Christian >> >> On Friday 30 September 2011 00:05:23 Christopher Cherrett wrote: >>> Any word on this? >>> >>> Christopher Cherrett wrote: >>>> Thank you very much for looking at this. >>>> >>>> I am not sure how to speak on the removal of functions but if this is >>>> working can it be committed by you? > I committed the patch now. I did some further cleanups, but I didn't > remove the functions I mentioned. They were all in the liblinuxsampler > API, and I thought it was nicer to change the API as little as possible. > Instead I made sure GetMidiProgram returns the program set by the latest > program change. > > /Andreas > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 > _______________________________________________ > Linuxsampler-devel mailing list > Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel A very big thank you!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
