I actually think the largest reason, for me, to use and praise it has nothing to do with the rendering engine, more to do with the separation and sandboxing of tab processes.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Dante Lanznaster <[email protected]> wrote: > I have one thing to say... If it was M$ releasing this same piece of > software, there would be 100% more bashing. Privacy is just non-existant, > vulnerabilities/DoS stuff have already been disclosed (don't even start with > the "still in beta" argument). > > I have absolutely no reason to migrate to Chrome just because it renders a > webpage 1 second faster. I might consider having it installed on the side > when having a browser with 100% Acid3 rendering will improve the overall > browsing experience. Other than that, Firefox 3 all the way (oh and not > supporting addons/plugins is a major showstopper, especially in Linux) > > just my 2c > > -Dante > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Jeff Lasman <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I preface the subject line with "temporarily offtopic" because Google >> will no doubt eventually create a version of Chrome for Linux. >> >> I'll let others, if they be so inclined, write about how good Chrome may >> be; I choose only to point out this: >> >> >> http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/web_services_browser/chrome_privacy_is_full_of_dents.html?kc=EWWHNEMNL090408EOAD >> >> Jeff >> -- >> Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services >> P.O. Box 52200, Riverside, CA 92517 >> Our jplists address used on lists is for list email only >> voice: +1 951 643-5345, or see: >> "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > [email protected] > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > -- Michael Gorman
