why take the chance .....?

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Peter Manis <[email protected]> wrote:

> I disagree.
>
> You are providing your information to a 3rd party, which has vowed to keep
> your information safe.  If that information is taken and used in a
> fraudulent manner by an employee or someone with unauthorized access I think
> that it would still fall under the banks fraud protection policies.  If you
> went out to eat and gave the waiter your credit card and he used your
> information to buy a TV that would be very similar in situation and I don't
> think that the bank would say it wasn't fraudulent, because I doubt a judge
> would say that it was legal.
>
> I've been using Mint since September of last year, all of my accounts are
> in there and I have had no troubles.
>
> "We ask for your online banking user name and passwords, but we do not see
> or store that information.
>            That means no one at Mint, and no potential hackers of Mint.com,
> can access your banking credentials."
>
> The ability to update your information without storing credentials implies
> that they have a way to authenticate against the bank's system using
> something a little more secure than the username and password you were able
> to pick when creating your online banking credentials.  Probably key based
> and since Mint is a read-only service knowing that you have $2345 in your
> personal checking account isn't going to do much good for anyone.  I
> remember mint talking about security a long time ago and if I remember
> correctly they mentioned using PGP.  One of the main team members of Mint
> was leading the development of server products for PGP, so he probably has a
> little experience with securing information.
>
> *Also not a lawyer, and I dont know about this TV you speak of*
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Jeff Lasman <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 03:44 am, Chris Penn wrote:
>>
>> > an interesting question asked in the mint forum
>> > http://forums.mint.com/showthread.php?t=823
>> > "What liability or insurance does Mint have in the event that Mint is
>> > hacked and my financial details are revealed to the attacker, through
>> > no fault of my own? "
>>
>> One more interesting part of their answer:
>>
>> <snip>
>> In addition to the points above, your credit card company protects you
>> in case of fraud and you would not lose this protection in any way by
>> using the Mint service.
>> </snip>
>>
>> I am neither a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, but I believe if I give
>> my login information to anyone I'm fully responsible for what they do
>> and that I don't have protection any more than I would if I got drunk
>> and went to my ATM and pulled out all my money and spent it on a
>> hooker. Anyway, that's what both my bank and PayPal told me (though not
>> quite in those words <smile>).
>>
>> I think their answer is wrong, and that I would lose my protection.
>>
>> Jeff
>> --
>> Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services
>> P.O. Box 52200, Riverside, CA  92517
>> Our jplists address used on lists is for list email only
>> voice:  +1 951 643-5345, or see:
>> "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html";
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Manis
> (678) 269-7979
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>


-- 
"As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to be
continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
-Roger Penrose

Reply via email to