On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Pat O'Brien<[email protected]> wrote: > I would tend to agree with you about the KVM thing, but I find it hard to > use Internet Explorer without a KVM, so I am sort of forced to...
I find it hard to use Internet Explorer... in general. -Chris may contain traces of Cynicism and Sarcasm > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Jeff Lasman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I'd guess more than six. Do you need to know an exact number? >> >> I may be interested in some too, in the case that others who spoke >> before me don't take all. Did you say they have a special BIOS that has >> no pee sea KVM console? Do they have RS-232 serial consoles instead for >> boot control? If so, that's exactly what I want! I hate pee sea KVM >> consoles as a reprehensible abomination, the console must always be >> RS-232 serial in my world. I've been using Sun SPARC gear instead of >> x86 just so I can have a serial console instead of KVM, but if there is >> an x86 machine that is not infested with the KVM disease, I would >> certainly be curious to at least look at it! >> >> MS >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > [email protected] > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > >
