On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, I am just resending that last post....
>
> "Anyone ever run into this issue with a recruiter or potential customer?
> Focusing on just one distro rather than focusing on understanding of
> fundamental Linux technique?"
>
> Absolutely.  An easy way to tell if someone is BSing on a resume is if
> they say something like:
>
> Objective:
> Looking for an entry level position with Acme Inc.
>
> Computer experience:
> OS: Window 3.1/95/98/2000/NT/ME/XP/Vista etc
> Applications: Word 97,2000, 2003, Flash, Adobe Reader, Publisher,
> Fireworks, Dreamweaver, Excel, ....
>

>  If that is all you know, don't even write it down.  I do not know a
> single person who can considered themselves an EXPERTS with all of
> those apps.
>
> or
> OS: Debian/Centos/Slackware/RHEL2,3,4,5/Ubuntu/Kubuntu/BackTrack3,4 etc...
>
> My favorite has to be:
> Programming: C/C++, Java, PHP, Python, Perl, awk,sed........but they
> leave out bash.
>

This is perfectly valid, it is stating being experience with, not an expert
with.  People also know that resumes are padded, it is the job of the
interviewer to find out what they really know.  You shouldn't put down
experience with Python if you don't understand the language, but putting it
down doesn't mean you are Guido.

Listing out distributions matters, for one if you use them all from time to
time it shows you can adapt to different environments and probably
understand a little more about Linux than about a distro.  If you have never
used Ubuntu and are coming from CentOS you have differences to overcome, but
having already used Ubuntu, even though you aren't an expert means that you
probably know the most common differences in the environment.

The one about bash could be perfectly valid, a person could write awk and
sed scripts and never write bash scripts, just like they can code in all
those languages and never write a shell script.  Also not being experienced
with bash scripting isn't really a negative if they really do know the other
languages since bash is fairly easy to learn.

Lack of information on a resume is just as bad as listing things you know
nothing about.  If you can write decent Python you should it put it under
experience, if you have only written a couple scripts while reading a book
then you probably shouldn't.


>
> but in the education section,
>
> Education:
> 1.5 years of community college, and a semester of Japanese ::grin::!!
>

The lack of a degree doesn't mean they don't know the things they put down,
I know some VERY good SAs that are proficient in a number of languages and
never went to college.  The lack of the degree means there is a good chance
they aren't very familiar with algorithms and design patterns, but you don't
know that they aren't, that is why it is up to the interviewer to ask
appropriate questions.

The problem is more about the interviewers, but I'll leave that for another
reply if someone actually wants my opinion on that.

Part of the problem with the recruiters or customers is that they don't
understand that understanding the underlying components of Linux is really
more important than the distro, but if the job requires hitting the ground
running, not knowing the specific distro matters.  The job may also not
require knowing Linux internals and they really do just want someone that
can admin a specific distro without needing time to adjust.


>
>
> How the hell do you expect most people to believe that you are and
> expert at all those languages.  Maybe you have seen the code, or gone
> to defcon, but COME ON.
>

What a black and white statement, someone can't be an expert in all those
languages so the alternative is that they have seen some code or gone to
defcon?  Why can't it be that they are very skilled in writing code in those
languages, but not proficient enough to write a book on any of them.


>
>
> Chris...
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I meant to say,
> > " If that is all you know, **dont** write it down."
> >
> > and
> >
> > "languages*"
> >
> > its late.
> >
> > Chris...
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> "Anyone ever run into this issue with a recruiter or potential customer?
> >> Focusing on just one distro rather than focusing on understanding of
> >> fundamental Linux technique?"
> >>
> >> Absolutely.  An easy way to tell if someone is BSing on a resume is if
> >> they say something like:
> >>
> >> Objective:
> >> Looking for an entry level position with Acme Inc.
> >>
> >> Computer experience:
> >> OS: Window 3.1/95/98/2000/NT/ME/XP/Vista etc
> >> Applications: Word 97,2000, 2003, Flash, Adobe Reader, Publisher,
> >> Fireworks, Dreamweaver, Excel, ....
> >>
> >>  If that is all you know, do write it down.  I do not know a single
> >> person who can considered themselves an EXPERTS with all of those
> >> apps.
> >>
> >> or
> >> OS: Debian/Centos/Slackware/RHEL2,3,4,5/Ubuntu/Kubuntu/BackTrack3,4
> etc...
> >>
> >> My favorite has to be:
> >> Programming: C/C++, Java, PHP, Python, Perl, awk,sed........but they
> >> leave out bash.
> >>
> >> but in the education section,
> >>
> >> Education:
> >> 1.5 years of community college, and a semester of Japanese ::grin::!!
> >>
> >>
> >> How the hell do you expect most people to believe that you are and
> >> expert at all those language.  Maybe you have see the code, or gone to
> >> defcon, but COME ON.
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:58 PM, David Kaiser <dkai...@cdk.com> wrote:
> >>> An interesting piece on Linux Journal...
> >>>
> >>> Anyone ever run into this issue with a recruiter or potential customer?
> >>> Focusing on just one distro rather than focusing on understanding of
> >>> fundamental Linux technique?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/does-distro-matter
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> LinuxUsers mailing list
> >>> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
> >>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to
> >> be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
> >>  -Roger Penrose
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to
> > be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
> >  -Roger Penrose
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to
> be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
>  -Roger Penrose
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to