keeping it simple is always a good policy except for the fact some sites I work on are massive... as in massive amounts of transactions per second which needs load balanced front ends, sometimes in the hundreds to thousands of servers per "cluster", sharding allows us to relieve a lot of database contention...
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Trevor Benedict <mre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Drizzle is a very good project. They took all the old, useless stuff out, > and made it much better. > Just how replication is going to work is going to be nice. > I dont use alot of MySQL's functionality, I try to keep things simple. > Simple = less issues. > -- Trevor > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Dino K <socalli...@cloudcomp.info> wrote: > >> Not to detract from the question but built in sharding on Drizzle will be >> awesome. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > >
_______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
