"Yea the #AntiSec Op is supposedly purely political but I am referring to lulzsec's previous activity"
I have no way of knowing who is the truth wrt Karim, but, there are always two sides to a story: http://pastebin.com/MQG0a130 It would make sense for a group that thinks it is at war to leverage "less" important information for more useful/damning information. NOTE: I am in no way justifying the actions mentioned above. Chris... On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Jesus Noland <konpa...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Yea the #AntiSec Op is supposedly purely political but I am referring to > lulzsec's previous activity > http://www.unveillance.com/latest-news/unveillance-official-statement/ > this was posted by http://twitter.com/#!/th3j35t3r > > Jesus Noland > Computer Science Student > Cal State Fullerton, University > --- > Just want to learn. > ________________________________ > From: Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> > To: SoCal LUG Users List <linuxusers@socallinux.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:47 PM > Subject: Re: [LinuxUsers] Recent News on Crackers (was: It's quiet!) > > "These crackers are only after money at least as far as lulzsec goes, > anonymous is more about protesting rights, and yea there is tons of > free software out there so you don't really need to crack legitimate > software." > > From what I can tell, LuLz and Anonymous are joining forces for the > more Anonymous like activities. > http://bit.ly/l3RqGM or http://bit.ly/ldzAfe > So it would seem that this AntiSec campaign is not for the $$. > > Correct me if I am wrong, I think LuLz is a hacker group and Anonymous > is more like a political movement, at least that is what CNN says. > > Chris... > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Mark Holmquist <marktrac...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> These crackers are only after money at least as far as lulzsec goes, >>> anonymous is more about protesting rights, and yea there is tons of free >>> software out there so you don't really need to crack legitimate software. >> >> Well, I imagine they're pursuing money in this fashion largely because of >> the way the media has portrayed hackers in the past. It's extremely >> disappointing. >> >> And it's not so much that you don't need to crack "legitimate software" (a >> class to which free software most certainly belongs) to avoid paying for >> software, but you don't need to attack people in order to get code to learn >> from. >> >> -- >> Mark Holmquist >> Student, Computer Science >> University of Redlands >> marktrac...@gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> > > > > -- > "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to > be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." > -Roger Penrose > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > -- "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." -Roger Penrose _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
