Is unicode really your challenge in shrinking your memory footprint? On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Dos-Man 64 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 23, 7:21 am, [email protected] wrote: > > Must admit this is an unusual phobia. An Ansi only OS is a dying legacy. > > Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry > > > > > > Just a preference. > > I come from the DOS/3.1/95/98 world. They are all "dying". In fact, > they're dead. They're also efficient and small. Unicode is bloat. It > slows down string handling and wastes memory, often times in > situations where the end user never uses anything but English anyway. > > > -- Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
