On Oct 18, 6:10 pm, Chris Miller <lordsauronthegr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Dos-Man 64 <chairs...@mail.com> wrote:
> > LOL.  Whatever that is :D
>
> Evidently you missed the whole "Church of Scientology" thing.  Few
> years back, some actor I forgot the name of converted to this church
> and various Internet message boards declared war.  I'm still not clear
> how an Internet message board can go to war, but for a while there was
> all of this anti-Scientology propaganda circulating the Internet.  It
> was one of those Internet memes which goes in one week and out the
> other.
>
> <hat id="admin">
>
> The trick is that these kinds of memes are off-topic.  On many message
> boards, they have a kind of "kitchen-sink" area where anything goes.
> We don't.  This entire group is supposed to be 100% on-topic (or very
> close to that).
>
> The other reason I reacted such is that I've seen a lot of specialized
> communities (similar ours, in that they're all there to talk about
> something specific) basically destroyed by religious "discussion."  It
> always starts innocently enough.  Someone uses some kind of
> religiously-charged comment.  Someone else attempts to refute that
> comment in passing.  Someone attempts to refute the refutation.  This
> continues until the original topic is long-lost and it's just a
> pissing match to see who can scream until their face turns blue (this
> is widely accepted to mean that the "debate" is over.)
>
> During this time, the original reason everyone was reading this thread
> is lost.  Most people don't care about religious differences in these
> technical group, so it taxes their patience.  It ultimately damages
> the community.  Additionally, every time such a flame-war happens, the
> likelihood for another flame-war to erupt increases (roughly
> exponentially).
>
> Put plainly, I have zero-tolerance for any kind of religious flame-war
> in this group.  Here we discuss GNU/Linux.  In the event that someone
> decides to start a religious flame-war, there will be bans.
>
> I know that you, "Dos-Man 64," didn't intend to start a war.  I think
> it's neat that you made a text drop shadow using your program.  But
> I'm still giving a warning: religiously-charged comments are taboo.
> They start things we don't want to have to deal with.  For that
> matter, politically- and racially- charged comments are taboo as well.
>  It just opens an off-topic can of worms that many people feel very
> passionately about.  Things get out of hand too easily, and I think we
> all would rather have none of that here.
>
> So, in the interest of ensuring that this group stays happy and
> on-topic, I just want to stick my foot down and say "hey man, that can
> start stuff that is bad."  So now you know, and we can continue on our
> merry way.  Again, I'm not angry, you're not in trouble.  I've just
> seen other communities damaged by this kind of nonsense, and I want to
> stop it before it starts.  Call me paranoid, but that's where it's at.
>
> So to recap:
>
> o Please avoid racially, politically, or religiously charged comments.
> o From time to time, these things happen.  It's OK.  Ignore it.  Do not react.
> o If you react in a way to a R/P/R -comment that is aggressive or
> could start a flame war, you will be banned.
>
> </hat>
>
> Cool embossing effect by the way.  It could be just me, but I think
> the right eye on the LGM face is a little wonky.  :)
>
> --
> Registered Linux Addict #431495
> For Faith and Family! | John 3:16!
> fsdev.net
> 0x5f3759df.org

I was involved in what you might call a religious controversy
recently.  It was a wild, bizarre, and stressful experience. It really
changed my viewpoints on churches and church-goers (negatively).  I
even designed a custom t-shirt.  Well, I just felt compelled to
express that opinion at my website using this image.  It was not my
intention to stir up any type of flame war, nor would I be willing to
participate in one.

I'm adding in an eye dropper tool tommorrow.  That helps quite a bit
in making it easier to choose colors.  The user can design a
background image containing any colors he or she wants to use while
drawing.

Yeah, his eye did get messed up a bit.  Diamonds are a bit tricky to
work with; the original windows version of ebid didn't even have
them.  I'm still getting used to using them.  Maybe I'll go back and
fix it ;)

dos-man

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group.
To post a message, send email to linuxusersgroup@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to linuxusersgroup-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit our group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup

Reply via email to