On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ping Cheng <pingli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:08 AM,  <ch...@cnpbagwell.com> wrote:
>> > From: Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com>
>> >
>> > This helps abstract out filtering better and also allows
>> > custom behavior on storing of samples as well; such as not
>> > moving avg window if no X/Y values have changed in current
>> > event cycle.
>>
>> I am a bit confused with the last sentence above. I think we move the
>> window even X/Y values stay the same. The code looks like that.
>
> Your right that current code moves window always.  The custom behavior was
> most important part of sentence.

I see. Thank you for the clarification.

> We can now register per-hardware filter
> routines easy and these routines can implement behavior of last sentence as
> they like.

Do you have examples in mind where we don't want to move the filter
window? I want to understand its potential.

Thank you Chris.

Ping

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Linuxwacom-devel mailing list
Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel

Reply via email to