On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Favux ... <favux...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Favux ... <favux...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> Testing the tag gesture3 with Natty's 2.6.38.11 kernel's wacom.ko I'd >>> say both scroll and zoom responsiveness are improved. >>> >>> There's less lag, and while there is still a little pointer jumping >>> once you get the "feel" you can keep it where you want it while >>> zooming. >> >> Good to get zooming opinion. I never used it before so couldn't tell >> much if its improved. >> >> Are you seeing pointer jumping during whole time of zoom or only when >> initially attempting to zoom? > > Only when initially attempting to zoom.
OK, good. That part is on my list to fix. > >> I still expect it during initial touching. Right now, it has only a >> hard coded 10ms holdoff to prevent movement while its deciding if your >> going to put down a second finger or not. Thats to short and >> definitely I see movement during initial touch. FYI: modify >> wcmTouchFilter.c:WACOM_GESTURE_LAG_TIME if you want to play with >> better values. >> >> I haven't touched this yet because I'm going to make it a >> provisionable SingleTouchTimeout. >> >>> >>> I do have a question about the scroll implementation. Once the scroll >>> gesture is recognized the "momentum" carries it to the end of the >>> contents. That doesn't seem to be natural to me. There doesn't >>> appear to be a way to stop in a document or thread. And the speed >>> means you had better be a very fast reader. >> >> The only option right now is to modify the "Wacom Touch Gesture >> Parameters" to increase the ScrollDistance. This will require more >> movement to send those scroll button events.. which should have a side >> affect of not so many pending events on the queue to process. >> >> If you find a comfortable value, let us know. Maybe it should become >> new default. > > Using xsetwacom and setting ScrollDistance to 180 (or thereabouts) > yields the kind of scrolling I would expect. This is really excellent > Chris, the best it has been. Hmm, I'm a little confused on that. Isn't your original value 600 or greater than that? Did lowering the value slow down scrolling, speed it up, or stop some infinite scrolling? If it didn't speed it up then there must be some secondary bug I need to investigate. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
