The normal situation is that an EID block is delegated to an administrative authority (a company). They use it. They may use the main block, and use some sub-blocks. That produces "holes" which are overlapping prefixes. The handling of that is described in the document. The ETRs which are responsible for the covering EID prefix must know which blocks are allocated elsewhere.
They have to identify those in the response.

THe details are spelled out.

The normal case would be that the division that was sold would be renumbered into its own or its new parents EID block. After all, they are no longer part of the original site. The overlapping prefix mechanisms allow for transition.

The more extreme case is not permitted. You can not have a LISP EID block, within which there is a hole which is used as IP addresses but not as LISP EIDs. (The inner portion can be used as both, but it has to be an EID.)

Yours,
Joel

On 6/22/2011 6:32 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
Dino,

Thanks for your responses - mine are in-line below.

Alia

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Dino Farinacci<[email protected]>  wrote:
...
If the site has an EID-prefix of the /16 that is the one it Map-Replies for.
We have rules in section 6.1.5 "EID-to-RLOC UDP Map-Reply Message" on how to
send Map-Replies when there are overlapping EID-prefixes and there has been
much discussion on this mailing list about it.

I agree that there's been lots of discussion on the list.  Capturing
the decisions made
into the draft would be good practice, IMHO, and ensure it has been resolved.

Can an ETR have an prefix which has a hole in it?  What happens if the
ETR does not
know the correct RLOCs to use for that hole (since it isn't owned)?

I'm thinking of a case where initially there is a LISP site with a
/16.  Then, part of that
company is sold along with the /24 that is used in that division.
Now, can the original
site advertise the /16 with a hole?  How would it do that?

The problem here is that the ETR does NOT KNOW the correct locator-set
for the /24 hole
that has been sold off.


_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to