Just as a point of differentiation, LISP is trying to do map-and-encaps over the wide area, whereas IRON is doing it within a bounded organization with native Internet routing over the wide area. So, LISP is an "inter-site" map-and-encaps system where IRON is an "intra-site" system (for some definition of "site"). I think some of the issues being discussed here are exacerbaed by that design departure.
Thanks - Fred _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
