On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >> Darrel has already mentioned that the ITR can "forward-on-cache-miss" by >> default if the implementation wants to protect its cache. > > How can these packets arrive at their destination? >
If they were destined non-LISP, they will get there like normal. (forward would have been your action anyway) If they were destined to LISP, they might end up on a PITR some where that already has a mapping, and then delivered to a destination ETR. -Darrel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
