I have reviewed this specification. I think it is ready to move forward, and I 
have sent it to IETF Last Call. I did see a couple of minor editorial issues, 
however (see below). You may fix those either by issuing a new draft or wait 
until further issues are brought up in directorate or other reviews.

    In addition to the set of EID-prefixes defined for each ETR that may
    register, a Map Server is typically also be configured with one or
    more aggregate prefixes that define the part of the EID numbering
    space assigned to it.

s/also be/also/

    An ETR may also request, by setting the "proxy-map-reply" flag
    (P-bit) in the Map-Regsiter message

Map-Register

Jari

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to