I have reviewed this specification. I think it is ready to move forward, and I
have sent it to IETF Last Call. I did see a couple of minor editorial issues,
however (see below). You may fix those either by issuing a new draft or wait
until further issues are brought up in directorate or other reviews.
In addition to the set of EID-prefixes defined for each ETR that may
register, a Map Server is typically also be configured with one or
more aggregate prefixes that define the part of the EID numbering
space assigned to it.
s/also be/also/
An ETR may also request, by setting the "proxy-map-reply" flag
(P-bit) in the Map-Regsiter message
Map-Register
Jari
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp