> I have reviewed this specification. I think it is ready to move forward,
> and I have sent it to IETF Last Call. I did see a couple of minor editorial
> issues, however (see below). You may fix those either by issuing a new
> draft or wait until further issues are brought up in directorate or other
> reviews.
>
> > In addition to the set of EID-prefixes defined for each ETR that may
> > register, a Map Server is typically also be configured with one or
> > more aggregate prefixes that define the part of the EID numbering
> > space assigned to it.
>
> s/also be/also/
>
> > An ETR may also request, by setting the "proxy-map-reply" flag
> > (P-bit) in the Map-Regsiter message
>
> Map-Register
Thanks. Will fix in the current draft but won't submit a new version until
other, more substantive changes, are requested or the review completes,
whichever comes first.
--Vince
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
