> From: Yakov Rekhter <[email protected]>
> Given that, the WG should not accept the draft, as it defines a whole
> bunch of code points without any companion document that defines
> semantics of these code points.
If you're really determined to find something to whine about, I guess maybe we
can just delete those code points for now?
As soon as someone writes an ID which uses them, they can be re-allocated -
and we'll let the IESG worry about which WG to assign that ID to.
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
