I view that there is consensus in the workgroup to adopt this draft as a work group item.
Can the authors please submit a revision in the appropriate fashion. I'd also like to remind the authors that as a WG document I am expecting that any substantive document changes are the result of WG discussion. I would also like to call the WG's attention to the comments regarding code points for transport of other protocols and ask the WG to consider those comments in the process of developing this draft. Cheers Terry On 13/08/12 4:09 PM, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In Vancouver the chairs received a request for the following document to be > adopted as a WG item. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-10 > > Here starts a 14 day call for adoption, this call will end on > Tuesday the 28th August, 2012. > > Please email the WG list stating that you either accept, or not accept, the > item. > > If you email to support the acceptance of this document as a WG item, please > also indicate if you are able and willing to either contribute to, or > review, (or both) the draft. > > Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately. > > Cheers > Terry >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
