Sorry, the references are going to have to be reorganized.
Even for an Informational document (which this is and should be), there
are normative references and informative references.
The distinction is based on whether the reference needs to be understood
in order to understand this document. For example, the base LISP spec
(or possibly just the Intro document, or Intro + Architecture?) need to
be understood by the reader for this to make any sense. As such, that
(or those) are normative references.
Yours,
Joel
On 9/13/2012 1:24 AM, Lori Jakab wrote:
This version contains mainly editorial changes, improving clarity. Also,
all references have been made informational, since this is an
informational draft.
-Lori
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
