On 09/13/12 08:08, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > Sorry, the references are going to have to be reorganized. > Even for an Informational document (which this is and should be), > there are normative references and informative references. > > The distinction is based on whether the reference needs to be > understood in order to understand this document. For example, the > base LISP spec (or possibly just the Intro document, or Intro + > Architecture?) need to be understood by the reader for this to make > any sense. As such, that (or those) are normative references.
Ok, will do that. Thanks Joel! -Lori > > Yours, > Joel > > On 9/13/2012 1:24 AM, Lori Jakab wrote: >> This version contains mainly editorial changes, improving clarity. Also, >> all references have been made informational, since this is an >> informational draft. >> >> -Lori _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
