Damien, With the WG co-chair hat stapled on.
Unfortunately this draft is not yet a WG item and pursuant to the agreement between the LISP chairs and the responsible AD, we will only focus on WG items until the priority, gating documents, are submitted to the IESG. Sorry, but I will not provide an agenda slot at IETF 85 for this item. I do (fully) expect that this document will become a WG item in the near future. In fact the LISP charter calls for it. However the line has been drawn in the sand - we MUST put the work into lisp-introduction and lisp-architecture first. If we have time remaining for an AOB session in Atlanta, and productive discussion is seen on the list about this draft before we all touchdown in ATL, Joel and I will be willing to allow microphone time (sans slides!) in AOB for a face to face discussion. Apologies for the tight hold on the reigns. I cannot stress this enough, we MUST get cracking on lisp-introduction and lisp-architecture! Cheers Terry On 14/10/12 8:07 PM, "Damien Saucez" <[email protected]> wrote: > Terry, > > Can we have a 10 min slot to present the implication document for > the IESG. This document is important as it shows we are making > progress on clearing the WG milestone associated with this > document. > >> A new version of I-D, draft-saucez-lisp-iesg-statement-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Damien Saucez and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-saucez-lisp-iesg-statement >> Revision: 00 >> Title: LISP IESG Statement >> Creation date: 2012-10-14 >> WG ID: Individual Submission >> Number of pages: 12 >> URL: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saucez-lisp-iesg-statement-00.txt >> Status: >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saucez-lisp-iesg-statement >> Htmlized: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-iesg-statement-00 >> >> >> Abstract: >> The Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol (LISP) relies on three >> simple principles to scale the Internet: address role separation, >> encapsulation, and mapping. In this document, based on >> implementation, deployment, and theoretical studies, we discuss the >> impact that a LISP deployment would have on the Internet and for the >> users. > > > Best regards, > > Damien Saucez > > On 12 Oct 2012, at 07:16, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is where I get to re-state the request for agenda items based on the >> Chairs and AD agreement to focus on priority documents as required by the >> LISP charter. >> >> Only WG drafts will be allowed an agenda slot at IETF 85. >> >> WG draft authors - I would like to hear from you sooner, rather than later, >> if you intend to provide an update on your documents. >> >> The key items of work that I would like a status from are: >> >> The two recently adopted Intro and Architecture drafts (that is their WG >> version documents when they are uploaded!!!!!) >> and >> draft-ietf-lisp-deployment >> draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf >> draft-ietf-lisp-sec >> draft-ietf-lisp-threats >> >> WG. Given this effort to re-focus on the charter deliverables, I urge you >> all to read the above drafts and bring forth your review to this list. >> >> Cheers >> Terry >> >> On 9/10/12 9:38 AM, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> There is a smidge over two weeks until a WG draft agenda for IETF 85 is due. >>> >>> "2012-10-24 (Wednesday): Draft Working Group agendas due by UTC 24:00" >>> >>> Please email requests for agenda slots to this list by 2012-10-22 (Monday). >>> >>> If you have been watching, you will notice that an IETF agenda is up, and we >>> have a 2 hour session on Tuesday (6th Nov) afternoon (1pm-3pm). >>> >>> Cheers >>> Terry >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
