> From: Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
> I do (fully) expect that this document will become a WG item in the
> near future. In fact the LISP charter calls for it. However the line
> has been drawn in the sand - we MUST put the work into
> lisp-introduction and lisp-architecture first.
But there is very little for the WG to do on these documents. They don't
cover any _new_ ground, which the WG might need to discuss - all they are
(effectively) are high-level descriptions of what's already been done.
Yes, I need to get moving on them, but what exactly is it that the WG is
going to do? Or, to put it another way, how is _not_ doing other things going
to speed up in any way the architecture document set?
Since this document is already called for by the charter, I would think
looking at it would be an entirely plausible use of meeting time.
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
