On 30 Oct. 2012, at 22:52 , Noel Chiappa <[email protected]> wrote:

>> From: Damien Saucez <[email protected]>
> 
> I'm still catching up from the storm (not too bad where I was, but we lost
> several days getting ready, and during it), but I saw one thing that confused
> me:
> 
>>> You can cite
>>> http://www.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de/papers/IB-CCLIM-07.pdf
> 
>> Luigi Iannone and Olivier Bonaventure. 2007. On the cost of caching
>> locator /ID mappings. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM CoNEXT conference
>> (CoNEXT '07).  ACM
> 
> ??? This document already references that (in Section 6.3. "Amount of State")?

Yes indeed. My point is that you can cite it also elsewhere (where I 
suggested?) because looks to me that is somehow related to the text/discussion.


> 
> 
> As a general note: I don't intend to reference every single thing written
> about LISP.

Absolutely.

> (That's for a 'LISP Bibliography' document.) I will follow
> standard practise and cite things which i) are the fundamental works on a
> topic, or ii) the author has relied upon, or iii) would be useful/informative
> to readers of the document at hand.

I was more on the iii) point. The two documents should (IMHO) take the LISP 
rookie by hand and guide him/her through the LISP world. Offering pointers to 
relevant literature is one way to do it, especially in the arch document those 
papers can support the rationale of the different design choices.

But this is just my viewpoint and you may have different plans for the 
documents.

> 
> I will take a look at the additional references you list (many of which are to
> very recent publications, BTW), and see if they fall under ii) or iii).

At least they are not very long papers... ;-)

ciao

Luigi

> (The
> Conext one fell under all of i), ii), and iii), which is why already it was
> already listed.)
> 
>       Noel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to