[snip] > At 04:04 09-01-2013, Luigi Iannone wrote: >> Not really, truth is that it was suggested to look at ORCHID, hence we tried >> to provide the same elements (or equivalent) that the ORCHID document >> provided. > > Although there may be some elements in common the problem is different. The > considerations were different and the environment was different when ORCHID > was approved as a RFC. >
That's why I put "(or equivalent)" ;-) As a general comment I would say that whether choosing ORCHID as example was a good or bad idea does not really matter now. Gather ideas and comments to go forward is the important point (and this thread is a of great help ;-)). ciao Luigi > Regards, > -sm _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
