Maybe I misunderstand, but I thought the point of the locator status
bits was to tell me whether the individual ETRs were up, and had
connectivity to the site that they are serving. If so, then the
unpredictability of reachability across the net from the ITR(s) to the
individual ETRs would seem to be irrelevant.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/21/2013 12:46 PM, Lori Jakab wrote:
Hi folks,
Damien is suggesting we recommend LSB not to be used for the
Internet-wide deployment of LISP, see below.
What do you think?
Best regards,
-Lori
On 01/21/13 19:06, Damien Saucez wrote:
On 21 Jan 2013, at 10:42, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/15/13 00:15, Damien Saucez wrote:
[...]
IMHO this document should suggest not to use LSB in the Internet case
deployment
Only for the above reason, or due to security concerns?
For me, the main reason not to use LSB in Internet is the problem
of definition of reachability, what does mean a LSB full of 1? It is not
because the one that set the LSB can reach all the RLOCs that it will
be the case for ITR sending the packet based on what it sees from the
LSB.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
