I see no problem in using them as long as you verify prior to trusting. -Darrel On Jan 21, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Lori Jakab wrote:
> Hi folks, > > Damien is suggesting we recommend LSB not to be used for the > Internet-wide deployment of LISP, see below. > > What do you think? > > Best regards, > -Lori > > On 01/21/13 19:06, Damien Saucez wrote: >> On 21 Jan 2013, at 10:42, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 01/15/13 00:15, Damien Saucez wrote: >>> [...] >>>> IMHO this document should suggest not to use LSB in the Internet case >>>> deployment >>> Only for the above reason, or due to security concerns? >> For me, the main reason not to use LSB in Internet is the problem >> of definition of reachability, what does mean a LSB full of 1? It is not >> because the one that set the LSB can reach all the RLOCs that it will >> be the case for ITR sending the packet based on what it sees from the >> LSB. > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
