> (I don't remember off the top of my head why I didn't like them: I think it > was a combination of the fixed number of bits, the fact that it might be > difficult for ETR X to know the state of ETR Y, the fact that 'reachable from > ITR A' [which you _really_ need to have anyway] is a subset of 'up', etc, > etc. But we didn't desperately need the header bits, and the mechanism wasn't > positively harmful, so I didn't bother to put up a big fight over it... :-)
Maybe because they could be spoofed? But they are good in control environments to take ETRs out of service without having to update the mapping database. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
