> From: Jeff Wheeler <[email protected]>
> LISP is a pet project. ... If you folks want it to grow out of the pet
> project stage anytime soon, then you should stop treating it like a pet
> project and start thinking about how to make it scale up effectively
> ...
> in business terms
I hear you, but Rome wasn't built in a day. Before the RIRs (for addresses),
and the registrar/registry system for DNS names, there were simpler things;
the current systems weren't brought forth full-grown, like Athena from Zeus'
brow.
> not just in technical terms (like negative map cache entries, which are
> a disaster)
Some of us have been trying to make sure that on the technical side, LISP has
the ability to scale to whatever scale is needed. No doubt there are still
lacks: some of which we may know about, others we probably don't. But any we
don't know about I personally would very much like to hear about. (Although
that's probably a new thread.)
But just out of curiousity, what's the issue with negative cache entries? I
haven't ever thought about them, so you may have seen something worth hearing
about.
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
