+1 Dino
On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:05 AM, [email protected] (Noel Chiappa) wrote: >> From: Jeff Wheeler <[email protected]> > >> LISP is a pet project. ... If you folks want it to grow out of the pet >> project stage anytime soon, then you should stop treating it like a pet >> project and start thinking about how to make it scale up effectively >> ... >> in business terms > > I hear you, but Rome wasn't built in a day. Before the RIRs (for addresses), > and the registrar/registry system for DNS names, there were simpler things; > the current systems weren't brought forth full-grown, like Athena from Zeus' > brow. > >> not just in technical terms (like negative map cache entries, which are >> a disaster) > > Some of us have been trying to make sure that on the technical side, LISP has > the ability to scale to whatever scale is needed. No doubt there are still > lacks: some of which we may know about, others we probably don't. But any we > don't know about I personally would very much like to hear about. (Although > that's probably a new thread.) > > But just out of curiousity, what's the issue with negative cache entries? I > haven't ever thought about them, so you may have seen something worth hearing > about. > > Noel > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
