> Yes. I think this is really not a LISP question as much as it is a corner > case for the host that LISP creates. With no changes to the host, if a host > moves, should the host expect to be able to continue talking to its existing > (G) members, or should the
Yes it should but G is not limited to just link-local. If a moved host expects to talk to on-subnet host via unicast Mac-addressing or link-local multicasting MAC addressing is a layer-2 interconnect issue WHICH LISP can support. But Paul - when you read 6831, it is related to layer-3 multicast. You probably know that but just FYI. > expectation be that host needs to do a join to the new (G') in the link-local > case. There is only one G that the app of the moving system is joined too. And also, link-local multicast groups are not explicitly joined. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
