I guess I saw "mobility" and thought it was abut the stuff we have seen in drafts abut LISP for mobile devices (cellular and WiFi). If the discussion topic is VM movement and L2 extension, yes, I agree with what you have said.

Yours,
Joel

On 3/24/2013 8:48 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
Joel - if we talk about link-local multicast being forwarded it is in context 
of an L2 overlay where EIDs are MAC addresses. So NVO3 related work, even 
though NVO3 is not limited to L2 overlays.

Dino

On Mar 24, 2013, at 3:54 PM, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:

Maybe I am naive, but it strikes me that trying to extend link-local IPv6 
multicasts with LISP is probably a bad idea.  Within the mobile device scope, 
the registration mechanisms would seem to provide better tools for things like 
address duplication prevention.

While I don't know if the documents capture it properly, the fragmentation 
effect of mobile devices on EID resolution blocks is such that I generally 
would want to keep them separate from the fixed devices.

Yours,
Joel

On 3/24/2013 6:13 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
I know I’m showing up late to the party, but can someone expand upon
this from the RFC?

*5.  Source Addresses versus Group Addresses*

    Multicast group addresses don't have to be associated with either the

    EID or RLOC namespace.  They actually are a namespace of their own

    that can be treated as logical with relatively opaque allocation.

    So, by their nature, they don't detract from an incremental

    deployment of LISP-Multicast.

The documents make reference to:

(S-EID,G)

(S-RLOC,G)

It seems that while both these may be numerically identical (eg.
239.255.255.254), in terms of LISP, doesn’t (S,G) have to much more
complex and represent either (S-EID,G-EID(IID)) and (S-RLOC,G-RLOC(IID))?

Once we introduce LISP mobility, what does (G) actually mean, especially
when (G) can refer to link-local multicast for a host that has roamed
off of its home subnet?

Paul



_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to