On 05/30/2013 04:53 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > On 5/30/13 9:30 AM, Lori Jakab wrote: >> [...] >> >>>>> 13. Section 5.1 >>>>> >>>>> * I would like to see some justification for the statement that the >>>>> increase in LISP deployment will reduce the need for BGP-based TE. I >>>>> can envision some scenarios where LISP could increase the >>>>> BGP-based TE >>>>> in order to access the "correct" ETR (or P-ETR). Is there some >>>>> studies >>>>> that back up this claim? >>>> >>>> I'm not aware of any conclusive study on this subject, that's why we >>>> worded the statement "may lead to a decrease" and explicitly mentioned >>>> the "late transition phase", when most sites use LISP. >>>> >>> >>> But, it does not say "may lead to a decrease", it says "will slowly >>> decrease the need..." and that sounds like a definitive claim. >> >> Would s/will/may/ resolve your concern? >> > > How about "may decrease the need"? That way, you don't have to leave > the reader wondering about the speed of the possible reduction.
Sounds good, thank you. Regards, -Lori > > Regards, > Brian > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
