>> I wasn't aware of the PCP standardization effort, and I'm not sure if
>> the authors of the draft mentioned above were.  I haven't fully read the
>> protocol, I'm not sure if it would cover all the necessities of LISP.
>> draft-ermagan-lisp-nat-traversal was designed for tight integration with
>> LISP.
>> 
> 
> I have yet to review that individual draft, but it is possible they are 
> re-inventing the wheel (STUN, PCP, UPnP, etc.).

The NAT-traversal document is also providing optimal RTR placement for a 
roaming node. Yes, the RTR needs to know the translated address so a 
simplification of STUN et al is provided, but that is only a very small subset 
of the complete proposal.

Dino


_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to