>> I wasn't aware of the PCP standardization effort, and I'm not sure if >> the authors of the draft mentioned above were. I haven't fully read the >> protocol, I'm not sure if it would cover all the necessities of LISP. >> draft-ermagan-lisp-nat-traversal was designed for tight integration with >> LISP. >> > > I have yet to review that individual draft, but it is possible they are > re-inventing the wheel (STUN, PCP, UPnP, etc.).
The NAT-traversal document is also providing optimal RTR placement for a roaming node. Yes, the RTR needs to know the translated address so a simplification of STUN et al is provided, but that is only a very small subset of the complete proposal. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
