> From: Damien Saucez <[email protected]>

    > I would have a question, if there is capability, it means that there is
    > a possibility to meet no capability so in this case what is replied?
    > ...
    > If 0 locators then it is a negative reply but conceptually this is not
    > a negative reply. If no answer, then the requester will keep continuing
    > sending requests.

Good points.

In general, I don't think we should keep tweaking Map-Request and Map-Reply
messages 'because they are there'. If we need to extend semantics, let's do
it right.

    > If a new message, what kind of message?

The has been some discussion about adding a new message-type to fill a
variety of roles which involve transferring information around (e.g.
dynamically loading configuration information such as default PxTRs into
small xTRs, a la DHCP, instead of having to manuall configure them).

This would seem to naturally fall into that general classification?

        Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to