Hi Albert, On 3/5/15 9:29 AM, Albert Cabellos wrote:
>> Section 1 >> >> I'm really not comfortable with your text... "Indeed and as pointed out >> by the unpublished Internet Draft by Noel Chiappa [Chiappa]" >> >> This isn't a stable reference and I don't think you need it. You could >> either rely on the later reference to RFC 4984, reference RFC 6830 >> itself, or take out the aside "and as... ... [Chiappa]" >> >> > The same reference is cited in RFC4984 and RFC4423, it is preferable to > cite it as it is or cite RFC4984? > My personal opinion is that RFC 4984 would be a perfectly reasonable reference for this. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
