Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - One advantage of doing a late review is that much has been said. I basically agree with all comments made the IESG so far. In particular with Jari: the charter is basically an initial promise. As such it should contain the right expectations (ex: standards track), and ideally the milestones (however, we don't have a clear consensus with the IESG on the milestones, so I won't insist). - "Besides this main focus, the LISP WG may work on the following items:" "May" is weird, when you have already adopted a WG. Ex: draft-ietf-lisp-yang-01.txt - Finally, - Management models: Support for managing the LISP protocol and deployments that include data models, as well as allowing for programmable management interfaces. These management methods should be considered for both the data-plane, control plane, and mapping system components. We speak about the management of the experimental RFCs or the new standards track document? Please clarify _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
