Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-01: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I had asked a clarification on which parts of the work of the WG will be going standards track and which parts experimental. The answer and suggested edits to the charter have made it clearer. Thank you. For what it is worth, I believe the working group should not put the entire list of work items (9 previous RFCs to be re-worked plus 7 new ones) targeting standards track. The new charter text has language that the situation will be evaluated for the new charter items, but at least my read of it gives a default answer of "standards track". In my view there are work items that would benefit from being targeted for an experimental round before made standards, and I thought the charter should have said that. There was pushback for my suggestion to do that, however. I do not plan to stand in the way of the working group making this charter update, but I wanted to be on record that the I didn't think this was a good idea. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
