If we should start a list of what items should be standards track, I think this is a decent start and is a practical base:
RFC 6830 (main spec) RFC 6831 (multicast spec) but decide if draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free should go instead or in addition RFC 6832 (Interworking) RFC 6833 (Map-Server (aka the mapping system control-plane)) draft-ietf-lisp-ddt And note these specs have been in use for at least 5 years. Dino On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-lisp-03-01: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I had asked a clarification on which parts of the work of the WG will be > going standards track and which parts experimental. The answer and > suggested edits to the charter have made it clearer. Thank you. > > For what it is worth, I believe the working group should not put the > entire list of work items (9 previous RFCs to be re-worked plus 7 new > ones) targeting standards track. The new charter text has language that > the situation will be evaluated for the new charter items, but at least > my read of it gives a default answer of "standards track". In my view > there are work items that would benefit from being targeted for an > experimental round before made standards, and I thought the charter > should have said that. > > There was pushback for my suggestion to do that, however. I do not plan > to stand in the way of the working group making this charter update, but > I wanted to be on record that the I didn't think this was a good idea. > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
