> Did anyone look at a weighted/probability based ID-Location schema where ITR
> chooses ETR by applying a "fuzzy" selection logic for moving identities?
> (movable && moving things)
In draft-meyer-lisp-mn we created a requirement and spec'ed out the M-bit in
the Map-Register message.
The intent was to allow an ITR or PITR to know that an ETR was acting in behalf
of an EID that moved often. Thereby allowing the ITR/PITR to flush its cache
often as an alternative to waiting for SMR messages from the ETR or Map-Notify
messages from map-servers.
Do you think this mechanism is sufficient for your requirement?
And yes, the priority and weights can be manipulated so the encapsulator has
choice to choose another ETR.
Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
