Maybe we should go in a draft through all the mechanisms, multi home, bits, Smr .. specifically in the context of handover Perhaps a heads up message from the mobile device is needed before fully moving from ETR to ETR ...
--szb > On Aug 27, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did anyone look at a weighted/probability based ID-Location schema where ITR > chooses ETR by applying a "fuzzy" selection logic for moving identities? > (movable && moving things) > > In draft-meyer-lisp-mn we created a requirement and spec'ed out the M-bit in > the Map-Register message. > > The intent was to allow an ITR or PITR to know that an ETR was acting in > behalf of an EID that moved often. Thereby allowing the ITR/PITR to flush its > cache often as an alternative to waiting for SMR messages from the ETR or > Map-Notify messages from map-servers. > > Do you think this mechanism is sufficient for your requirement? > > And yes, the priority and weights can be manipulated so the encapsulator has > choice to choose another ETR. > > Dino
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
