Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for this draft. I plan to recommend its approval, but first I would like to ensure that the issues raised by Dale Worley in his Gen-ART review are addressed satisfactorily and in consultation with the working group, to ensure that the document is as clear as possible. Specifically, the questions about XEIDs and the definition of a peer and a DDT node at least need to be worked through. (I’m not necessarily asking for text changes, but looking for convergence in the discussion so that we are on the same page about what is meant. And I see the discussion is already ongoing -- thanks for that.) _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
