> 
> What Luigi had suggested was:
>  Documents that request for a new LISP packet type MAY indicate
>  a preferred value.
> 
> That fix works for me.  Leaving it saying something about section 10.4 is 
> incorrect.

This is in the latest revision. Thanks. 

Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to