Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end and will update this document as appropriate.
Thanks, Alberto On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a > working group document, maybe this document should point to > draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00? > > Dino > > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft > [1]. The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send > SMRs and includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as > the preferred PubSub mechanism. > > > > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would > like to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG > item). > > > > Thanks, > > Alberto > > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lisp mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
