Hi, I was wondering….. why not putting this as an appendix in the pubsub document? Stating that was the previous solution for what pubs does and that is kept in appendix as informational material.
any thoughts? L. > On 5 Apr 2018, at 23:17, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sounds good to me Dino. I'll wait for the adoption call of lisp-pubsub to end > and will update this document as appropriate. > > Thanks, > Alberto > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Just one editorial comment Alberto. If the pubsub draft is about to be a > working group document, maybe this document should point to > draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-00? > > Dino > > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We have just posted an updated version of the MS-originated SMRs draft [1]. > > The revised document discusses how/when the MS is supposed to send SMRs and > > includes a note pointing to draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub as the > > preferred PubSub mechanism. > > > > Let us know if you have any comment. As discussed in London, we would like > > to move forward with this as informational (and preferably as a WG item). > > > > Thanks, > > Alberto > > > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06 > > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-06> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lisp mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp> > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
