> On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi Dino, > > Almost. How about: > > > OLD: > > When the UDP and LISP headers require integrity protection, the > methods of using UDP checksums in [RFC8085] can be considered. > > NEW: > > Implementors are encouraged to consider UDP checksum usage guidelines in > section 3.4 of [RFC8085]. Specifically, when the UDP, LISP, and outer IPv6 > headers require protection against corruption, the use of non-zero UDP > checksums is RECOMMENDED.
Well if we recommend it and when describing the UDP header in the packet format section we don’t that woudl be a contracdiction. And note the IPv6 outer header cannot be protected with a UDP checksum. The link-layer CRC will do that. NEWNEW: Implementors are encouraged to consider UDP checksum usage guidelines in section 3.4 of [RFC8085] when it is desirable to protect UDP and LISP headers against corruption. What do you think? Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
