The working group decided to not document that bit since LISP-GPE was further behind in the standards process. That could be different now but others can comment.
Dino > On Sep 27, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Dino, > >> On Sep 27, 2018, at 12:53 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> This draft needs to update RFC6830 since it takes the last reserved bit away >>> from there. As a side question, since 6830 is being bised right now should >>> this >>> flag be acknowledged in the bis draft? >> >> The working group decided to not have 6830bis refer to LISP-GPE. > > Makes sense. Luigi was on the call today and clarified this. I am perfectly > happy with this updating only RFC6830. > > Thanks > Suresh > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
