Hi, > On 27 Sep 2018, at 18:53, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This draft needs to update RFC6830 since it takes the last reserved bit away >> from there. As a side question, since 6830 is being bised right now should >> this >> flag be acknowledged in the bis draft? > > The working group decided to not have 6830bis refer to LISP-GPE.
As I said during the IESG Telechat, my take is that 6830bis should not refer to GPE, that would be a circular dependency. Let’s leave 6830bis as it is, with the last bit reserved. LISP-GPE will update 6830bis allocating the last bit. Looks to me as a standard IETF procedure. Ciao L. > > Dino > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
